Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to pay the price of politics in the Middle East
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
RIYADH: Whenever conflicts erupt in the Middle East, American consumer brands are often among the first targets of public anger. The war in Gaza has been no different, with McDonald’s and Starbucks branches in Lebanon attacked and consumer boycotts announced throughout the region. These attacks and boycotts echo similar scenes from the time of the Second Intifada in the early 2000s and the Iraq War era, which prompted a ban on Coca-Cola that remained in place in many Arab countries for decades, giving its rival Pepsi a market advantage enjoyed to this day.
Companies from Starbucks to McDonald's face controversy amid
McDonald's and its challenges worldwide: a market-by-market look
Pricey lattes helped boost Starbucks sales
Visualizing America's Most Popular Fast Food Chains
War in Ukraine: McDonald's, Coca-Cola and Starbucks halt Russian sales
Starbucks Employees Paid Leave Policy Extended Amid Coronavirus
Israel-Hamas War Leads to Boycotts of Multinational Brands
Why thousands of restaurants are open, but you're not allowed
McDonald's and Starbucks: 43% Yin, 35% Yang
McDonald's vs. Starbucks Business Models Compared - FourWeekMBA
Brand America
Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to
Fact-Check: Has Pepsi modified its Product Design to support
Higher Menu Prices Lift McDonald's U.S. Sales but Consumer Outlook
Starbucks faces festive misery with strikes, boycotts and
de
por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)
